Is USB 3 85 Ω or 90 Ω? What the Specifications Actually Say
· 6 min read · pcbplanner
Search for the impedance of a USB 3 pair and you will find both 85 Ω and 90 Ω, each stated as if it were the obvious answer. Both numbers are real and both come from USB-IF documents — they simply describe different parts of the link.
Route your board to 90 Ω differential. 85 Ω is the target for the mated Type-C connector and the reference impedance the Type-C S-parameters are normalised to, not a trace specification.
Where each number comes from
| Value | What it applies to | Document |
|---|---|---|
| 72–120 Ω | The silicon: transmitter and receiver DC differential impedance | USB 3.2, Tables 6-18 and 6-22 [1] |
| 85 Ω | The impedance all Type-C S-parameters are normalised to | Type-C R2.0 §3.7 [2] |
| 85 Ω ± 9 Ω | The mated connector, measured with a 40 ps edge | Type-C R2.0 §3.7.3.1 [2] |
| 90 Ω ± 5 Ω | The raw cable (45 Ω ± 3 Ω single-ended for coaxial construction) | Type-C R2.0 §3.7.1 [2] |
| 75–105 Ω | The mated legacy USB 3.0 connector, including its PCB footprint | USB-IF connector whitepaper [3] |
| 90 Ω nominal | The design target for the link as a whole | USB-IF connector whitepaper [3] |
| 90 Ω ± 10 % / ± 15 % | PCB traces, as chip vendors specify them | Genesys Logic [6], TI [4] |
So the trace number that USB-IF itself states is 90 Ω: “USB 3.0 specification defines a 90-ohm nominal characteristic impedance. If every component in the SuperSpeed link is designed with a 90-ohm impedance, there won't be any reflection” [3]. The 85 Ω figure only ever appears attached to the connector or to the S-parameter reference.
One wrinkle worth knowing: some SoC vendors publish their own number. TI's layout guidelines use 90 Ω on older devices and 95 Ω on newer ones, with a ±5 % window[5]. If your controller's datasheet states an impedance, follow it — it describes that device's package and receiver.
How much does the difference actually cost?
The interesting part is how small this argument is. A trace at 90 Ω meeting a connector at 85 Ω produces a reflection of
Γ = (85 − 90) / (85 + 90) = 0.029, which is −31 dB of return loss.
Put next to the other discontinuities on the same link:
| Discontinuity | Return loss |
|---|---|
| 90 Ω trace into an 85 Ω connector | −31 dB |
| A 90 Ω trace built 10 % low by the fabricator (81 Ω) | −26 dB |
| A trace that arrives at 75 Ω | −21 dB |
| A connector launch with no plane voiding, sinking to 40 Ω [3] | −8 dB |
Your fabricator's ±10 % tolerance moves the impedance further than the entire 85-versus-90 question, and a badly voided connector footprint moves it twenty decibels further again. Which is to say: pick 90 Ω, then spend your attention on tolerance and on the launch.
Design a 90 Ω pair on your stackup and see the tolerance →
What actually decides whether the link passes
USB 3.2 gives an informative budget of 8.5 dB for a host or device and 23 dB for the whole channel, at 2.5 GHz for Gen 1 and 5 GHz for Gen 2 [1]. Against that:
- The connector launch. Without ground voiding under the receptacle pads, the launch impedance can fall to about 40 Ω — the whitepaper calls the voiding imperative[3].
- The coupling capacitors. Mandatory on every transmitter, 75–265 nF, and no larger than 0603 — TI asks for 0402 or smaller with the plane voided under the pads[1, 4].
- Via stubs. Keep them under 15 mil or back-drill them; at 5 GHz the stub costs more than the via [4].
- Loss. On ordinary FR-4 a Gen 2 pair spends roughly 0.7 dB per inch at 5 GHz, so a long run eats the budget before anything else does.
The rest of the rules, briefly
- Intra-pair matching: about 5 mil, or 15 ps per metre. The specification sets no board limit; the raw cable is held to 10 ps per metre [2, 4].
- Pair-to-pair: no requirement at all. The transmit and receive pairs do not have to be the same length [4].
- Polarity: the two lines of a pair may be swapped to avoid a crossover [4].
- Spacing: five trace widths between pairs, 30 mil to any other signal, 50 mil to a clock [4].
- Reference: one solid ground reference end to end, with stitching vias within 200 mil of every layer change [4].
Checklist
- Design the traces to 90 Ω differential, ±10 %, unless your controller's datasheet states otherwise.
- Treat 85 Ω as the connector's number, not the trace's.
- Void the reference plane under the receptacle pads and under the coupling capacitors.
- Coupling capacitors 75–265 nF, 0402 or smaller, on the transmit pairs.
- Match within a pair to about 5 mil; ignore matching between pairs.
- Keep via stubs under 15 mil, and ask the fabricator for controlled impedance rather than hoping.
Check a USB 3.2 pair against every rule on your own stackup →
Tools used in this guide
- Interface Design Rules – Impedance, skew, loss budget and length limits of PCIe, USB, Ethernet, HDMI, DDR and other interfaces, applied to a layer of your own stackup with the field solver.
- Impedance Calculator – Single-ended and differential microstrip, coated and embedded microstrip, stripline and coplanar lines, solved with a 2D field solver.
- Stackup Advisor – Enter board thickness, layer count and impedance requirements; the field solver ranks every matching fab stackup and gives the trace widths.
Sources
- USB 3.2 Specification, Revision 1.1, June 2022 (Table 6-18 transmitter, Table 6-22 receiver, §E.6.4 insertion-loss budget).
- USB Type-C Cable and Connector Specification, Release 2.0, August 2019 (§3.7 normalisation, §3.7.1 cable, §3.7.3.1 mated connector).
- USB-IF, Managing Connector and Cable Assembly Performance for USB SuperSpeed, Rev. 1.0, 2013.
- Texas Instruments SLLA414A, High-Speed Layout Guidelines for Signal Conditioners and USB Hubs, rev. 2026.
- Texas Instruments SPRAAR7J, High-Speed Interface Layout Guidelines, rev. 2023 (Appendix A, per-device impedance tables).
- Genesys Logic GL3520 USB 3.0 Hub Design Guide, Rev. 2.11, 2015.
More guides
- PCB Crosstalk and the 3W Rule: How Much Spacing Is Enough?
- How Much Current Can a PCB Via Carry? Worked Examples for Power Rails
- 100 nF or 10 µF? Choosing Decoupling Capacitors for a PCB
- Controlled Impedance Explained: Microstrip, Stripline and Solder Mask
- How to Choose a PCB Stackup (and What 1080, 2116 and 7628 Mean)
- PCIe Gen3 Routing on a Hobby Budget: Lessons from an M.2 NVMe Carrier Card
- AC Coupling Capacitors on High-Speed Links: the Value for Every Interface
- How Much Copper Does a Regulator Need? PCB Heat Spreading in Numbers
- Creepage and Clearance for Mains Circuits (IEC 60664-1)